Kathmandu: Great deal of uncertainty remains over the proposed Nepal-India joint technical committee meeting on air routes which was scheduled for the first week of February, amid controversy over India’s proposal to allow overnight stay for in-flight security officer, popularly known as “air marshal”.
Sources at the Tourism Ministry and the Civil Aviation Authority of Nepal (Caan) said India had kept the second round of meetings on its priority list. However, after the controversy sparked in Nepal, India has not responded to calls to fix a date for the meeting. The first meeting was held in New Delhi last December, in which India had proposed allowing overnight stay for in-flight security officer. The issue created too much of “unnecessary” controversy, with parliamentarians expressing suspicion about India’s intention, Caan officials said, adding India had only made the proposal and nothing had been finalised. “We are not exactly sure whether the delay is the fallout of the controversy.”
Caan had formed a nine-member technical team led by Sudhir Kumar Chaudhary, director of the Flight Operation Department, to hold the meeting. Caan had written to the Airport Authority of India twice on January 11 and 31 to fix the meeting date and venue. “However, we have not heard anything from the Indian side as of now,” said a high-level Caan official.
In the Delhi meeting, India had agreed to develop the Trans-Himalaya 2 air route and redefine the Kathmandu-Mahendranagar-Delhi (L626) route as a bi-directional route. The southern neighbour also granted bi-directional facility for the Lhasa-Kathmandu-Bharatpur-Bhairahawa-Delhi B345 route and the Kathmandu-Jaleshwor-Patna G335 route.
However, there were no substantial development with regard to three new cross-border air entry points in Janakpur, Bhairahawa and Nepalgunj airspaces that Nepal had proposed with the view of connecting the upcoming international airports in Bhairahawa, Pokhara and Nijgadh.
09/02/17 eKantipur
To Read the News in full at Source, Click the Headline
Sources at the Tourism Ministry and the Civil Aviation Authority of Nepal (Caan) said India had kept the second round of meetings on its priority list. However, after the controversy sparked in Nepal, India has not responded to calls to fix a date for the meeting. The first meeting was held in New Delhi last December, in which India had proposed allowing overnight stay for in-flight security officer. The issue created too much of “unnecessary” controversy, with parliamentarians expressing suspicion about India’s intention, Caan officials said, adding India had only made the proposal and nothing had been finalised. “We are not exactly sure whether the delay is the fallout of the controversy.”
Caan had formed a nine-member technical team led by Sudhir Kumar Chaudhary, director of the Flight Operation Department, to hold the meeting. Caan had written to the Airport Authority of India twice on January 11 and 31 to fix the meeting date and venue. “However, we have not heard anything from the Indian side as of now,” said a high-level Caan official.
In the Delhi meeting, India had agreed to develop the Trans-Himalaya 2 air route and redefine the Kathmandu-Mahendranagar-Delhi (L626) route as a bi-directional route. The southern neighbour also granted bi-directional facility for the Lhasa-Kathmandu-Bharatpur-Bhairahawa-Delhi B345 route and the Kathmandu-Jaleshwor-Patna G335 route.
However, there were no substantial development with regard to three new cross-border air entry points in Janakpur, Bhairahawa and Nepalgunj airspaces that Nepal had proposed with the view of connecting the upcoming international airports in Bhairahawa, Pokhara and Nijgadh.
09/02/17 eKantipur
0 comments:
Post a Comment