IATA Agents Association of India (IAAI) has filed a case against IATA IATA at Gurgaon, Haryana, seeking directive for the reconstitution of APJC-India under Appendix ‘F’ – of PAConf New Guidelines of January 2014. This has led to a case under CrPC (Code of Criminal Procedure) against the IATA Representative, Vinod Malhotra.
According to a release issued by IAAI, till end-2013, in countries governed under 810 and 818g, Agents’ Representation in APJC was decided between the Travel Associations. In India, however, IAAI was kept out of APJC by the vested interests.
In January 2014, PAConf issued globalized directives to countries under Res 818g to regularize APJC under Appendix-“F” of the New Guidelines - Establishment of an APJC – directing that the IATA local/regional offices must be responsible for the formation and regularizations of the APJCs in a country.
When our legitimate right was denied again, there was no other way to push our proposed DIP (Default Insurance Program) through APJC-India, and IAAI was constrained to approach the Court of Law for justice and fairness.
17/06/15 Travel Trands Today
To Read the News in full at Source, Click the Headline
According to a release issued by IAAI, till end-2013, in countries governed under 810 and 818g, Agents’ Representation in APJC was decided between the Travel Associations. In India, however, IAAI was kept out of APJC by the vested interests.
In January 2014, PAConf issued globalized directives to countries under Res 818g to regularize APJC under Appendix-“F” of the New Guidelines - Establishment of an APJC – directing that the IATA local/regional offices must be responsible for the formation and regularizations of the APJCs in a country.
When our legitimate right was denied again, there was no other way to push our proposed DIP (Default Insurance Program) through APJC-India, and IAAI was constrained to approach the Court of Law for justice and fairness.
17/06/15 Travel Trands Today
