The Delhi High Court today said the aviation regulator, DGCA, had the power to grant the airline companies an exemption from the stipulated flight duty time limitations (FDTLs) of pilots, but "not as a matter of routine". A bench of Acting Chief Justice Gita Mittal and Justice C Hari Shankar gave the ruling on pleas filed by Air India and the Federation of Indian Airlines (FIA), seeking modification of the high court's April 18 direction to the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) not to permit variations in FDTLs.
The FIA represents private carriers Jet Airways, IndiGo, SpiceJet and GoAir.
The court directed the DGCA to indicate its stand on the applications.
The regulator was also asked to place on record the applications of airlines seeking exemptions or variations in FDTLs from December 1 last year till date and the orders passed by the DGCA in each case.
"Under Rule 133A(4) of the Aircraft Rules, the DGCA stands empowered to grant exemptions," the court said, adding, "Prima facie, we have no doubt that neither any exemption to prescriptions under the Civil Aviation Requirement (CAR) nor any variation thereof can be given as a matter of routine."
The bench listed the matter for further hearing on August 2.
Senior advocate P Chidambaram, appearing for the FIA, told the court that exemptions from the stipulated FDTLs were only granted in exceptional circumstances and if none were granted, it would lead to "flights and passengers being stranded all over the place".
"It will create utter chaos," he said and asked the court to clarify its April 18 order by saying that the DGCA will also take into account Rule 133A(4), when considering an airline's application for exemptions.
The court had, in its April 18 order, said the DGCA would be bound by the amended Rule 42A of the Aircraft Rules, which did not give it the power to permit any contravention of the stipulated FDTLs.
Chidambaram said the court had passed the order as it was not informed about Rule 133A(4), which gave the DGCA the power to grant exemptions.
State-run Air India, represented by advocate Lalit Bhasin, also took a similar line of argument.
22/05/18 PTI/moneycontrol.com
To Read the News in full at Source, Click the Headline
The FIA represents private carriers Jet Airways, IndiGo, SpiceJet and GoAir.
The court directed the DGCA to indicate its stand on the applications.
The regulator was also asked to place on record the applications of airlines seeking exemptions or variations in FDTLs from December 1 last year till date and the orders passed by the DGCA in each case.
"Under Rule 133A(4) of the Aircraft Rules, the DGCA stands empowered to grant exemptions," the court said, adding, "Prima facie, we have no doubt that neither any exemption to prescriptions under the Civil Aviation Requirement (CAR) nor any variation thereof can be given as a matter of routine."
The bench listed the matter for further hearing on August 2.
Senior advocate P Chidambaram, appearing for the FIA, told the court that exemptions from the stipulated FDTLs were only granted in exceptional circumstances and if none were granted, it would lead to "flights and passengers being stranded all over the place".
"It will create utter chaos," he said and asked the court to clarify its April 18 order by saying that the DGCA will also take into account Rule 133A(4), when considering an airline's application for exemptions.
The court had, in its April 18 order, said the DGCA would be bound by the amended Rule 42A of the Aircraft Rules, which did not give it the power to permit any contravention of the stipulated FDTLs.
Chidambaram said the court had passed the order as it was not informed about Rule 133A(4), which gave the DGCA the power to grant exemptions.
State-run Air India, represented by advocate Lalit Bhasin, also took a similar line of argument.
22/05/18 PTI/moneycontrol.com
0 comments:
Post a Comment